Family and Society

Soc 2433 at the College of Saint Scholastica

  • Pages

  • RSS Contexts blogs

    • Clowns to the Left of Me, Jokers to the Right—Dude, Where’s My Stimulus?
      Years ago, I once had a conversation with an economist who freely admitted that there was no unified macroeconomic theory.  What works versus what doesn’t work in a particular sociopolitical context is really just so much spitballing.  This never surprised me given the complex realities of global capitalism. I’ve been genuinely perplexed by Barac […]
    • Weekends Are for Porn (Not News)
      Just in case you’ve ever wanted evidence that people do more online searches for porn on weekends (especially Friday nights!): Thanks to Larry. UPDATE: Reader Dangger sent us a comparison of searches for porn and news: (Via.) (View original at http://contexts.org/socimages)
    • Weber’s Monopoly on Violence
      Perry H. sent in this cartoon: The cartoon, of course, reminds us of the power of words.  Calling something “terrorism” is a way to make it seem illegitimate.   And, often, what makes violence illegitimate is not something inherent in the violence itself, but your perspective on it. The cartoon also reminds us of Max Weber’s insight that th […]
    • Finally A Women’s Movement Men Can Get Behind
      Last week Barbara Ehrenreich wrote a scorching critique of the uproar over pushing regular mammography back till 50-years-old, in light of the muted response to the Stupak amendment excluding abortion from both state and public health insurance programs. “So welcome to the Women’s Movement 2.0,” she writes “pink-ribbon culture has replaced […]
    • Homo-hatred in Uganda: a gift from US conservative evangelicals
      In yesterday’s news, CNN reporter Saeed Ahmed asks “Why is Uganda attacking homosexuality?” As Ahmed reports, the Anti-Homosexuality Bil in this Eastern African nation (introduced in October, and expected to pass by the end of December) “features several provisions that human rights groups say would spur a witch hunt of homosexuals in […]
    • US literacy rates (2003)
      The key Number of Adults in Each Prose Literacy Level Prose Literacy * Below Basic: o no more than the most simple and concrete literacy skills * Basic: o can perform simple and [...]
    • The Discovery Channel: “Not for Women’s Eyes”
      Benno K. sent in a link to some ads he saw in the Netherlands for the Discovery Channel, which Benno describes as “the channel that used to be for science, but is now mostly explosions and motor bikes.” In both posters the men have “women’s” eyes–that is, they appear wide-eyed and long-lashed, with mascara: The caption say […]
    • Public bathroom of the future – revised
      Work in progress Regular readers will recognize this as a slightly modified version of a bathroom design I posted a couple weeks ago. I took some time to incorporate readers’ comments and hope you’ll continue to make recommendations. Here are the major changes: + all the plumbing is routed through exterior walls + sight lines are [...]
    • Class and the Framing of a Work-Free Year
      This cartoon illustrates how a work-free year is interpreted as lazy and irresponsible if you’re a working class person and a well-deserved treat if you’re middle class or better. Found at The Ongoing Adventures of ASBO Genuis, via Missives from Marx. (View original at http://contexts.org/socimages)
    • The Relativity of Feminist Liberation
      I spent a day in Salzburg this September with a man from Dubai.  We had a wonderful time comparing perspectives. Dubai, he explained, was a wildly modern, multicultural city.  The default language in public was English due to the international population.  He was a stockbroker who had gone to college in London and gone part way through an MBA. He interacted […]

Assignment P3

The goals of Assignment P3:

  • To study the process of family formation: how people meet and come together
  • To consider differences across culture or subculture, including across time
  • To apply the criteria of scientific observation
  • To link the concepts (theories) and findings (facts) from the textbook with observed data

Assignment P3 has three components: observation,  analysis, and writing

  1. Observation phase gathers data about couples coming together to form a family from one of several sources
    • Watching the movie “Arranged” about two women in modern America whose tradition involves arranged marriage
    • Interviewing one or both members of each of two couples who either got married or started a family at least 25 years apart, or
      are two generations in the same family. This could be you or a sibling (if you have started a family) + your parents, or your parents
      and grandparents, or a couple you know in their 20s and another couple you know (unrelated) in their 50s or older.  The greater the difference in ages, the more likely you are to see differences. The couples should be of the same race/ethnic background.
    • Interviewing one or both members of each of two couples of similar age but different ethnic or racial backgrounds. Here it is important that the couples be very similar in age so that you only see the effect of race/ethnicity not time.
    • Interviewing one or both members of each of two couples with children about the impact of having children on their relationship to each other, on their work patterns and aspirations, and about the process of raising children
    • Interviewing one or both members of a gay/lesbian couple in a committed relationship or who are raising children together and of a heterosexual couple who are in a committed relationship or who are raising together.
    • Take notes during your interview or the movie, which are the data that you analyze for your paper. The notes are not your paper.
  2. Analysis phase:  Making comparisons, observing patterns or theme
    • The things that people said are their perspectives – but they are not the sociological perspective.  For instance, if a couple from a culture different from yours says, “Culture makes no difference” but your data show that, as the book described, they had married at a later age and placed more emphasis on individualism than the other couple you interviewed, your analysis would show that differences exist, but members of various cultures may be unaware of those differences.
    • Look for information in the Seccombe text about the features that distinguish the couples from each other: the time frame when the marriage/family was started,race/ethnicity, social class, gender orientation of couple – and see whether the stated fact is observed in your data.
  3. Writing phase:  Present the results of your study in a 2 page paper
    • Briefly (2-3 sentences, 1/2 page or less) describe the structure of the families whose members you interviewed, and the trait that distinguishes them (e.g., which social class, which ethnicity).  (15 points)
    • Describe two patterns or comparisons between the couples that are linked to information from the Seccombe text. Each comparison should take at least one paragraphs, and should have at least two citations to the Seccombe text book.  (30 points each)
    • Conclude with a paragraph in which you describe how you used the methods of social science in your interviewing and in your analysis.  Your paragraph should include at least two citations of the earlier portion of the Seccombe text on methods and theory.  (15 points)
    • Your paper should be well-written, without spelling or grammatical errors, double-spaced, with a title page, and stapled.  Papers that are not stapled will not be accepted.  (10 points)

Due Date:  Friday, November 13

One Response to “Assignment P3”

  1. Amy Skroch said

    For our concluding pragraph you ask us to describe how we used the methods of social science with our analysis. What are the methods of social science, are they like the reseach methods from P1?

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>